MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3208188766 · doi:10.4324/9780203132685-32

Cadbury’s chocolate bars: not such a sweet smell of success?

2012· book-chapter· en· W3208188766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Prothero

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorticultureArtAdvertisingBiologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cadbury is a world-renowned manufacturer of confectionary products (candy/sweets, biscuits/cookies and the famous Cadbury creme eggs) and was founded by a Quaker family in 1824 in the UK. The company acquired Schweppes line of tonic water and related products in the late 1960s. Cadbury Schweppes went on to acquire Sunkist, Canada Dry, Dr. Pepper, Snapple, and Royal Crown over the years. In March 2007, it was revealed that Cadbury Schweppes was planning to split its business into two separate entities: one focusing on its main chocolate and confectionery market; the other on its US drinks business. The demerger took effect on May 2, 2008, with the drinks business becoming Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. In 2010 Cadbury was acquired in a controversial hostile takeover by Kraft Foods. The acquisition of Cadbury faced widespread disapproval from the British public, as well as groups and organizations including trade union Unite, who fought against the acquisition of the company which, according to then Prime Minister Gordon Brown, was very important to the British economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→