MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208198712 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4697625

A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy: Nested Samples for Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation

2021· dataset· en· W3208198712 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas E. Riley, Anna L. Watts, Paul S. Ray, Slavko Bogdanov, Sébastien Guillot, Sharon M. Morsink, A. V. Bilous, Zaven Arzoumanian, Devarshi Choudhury, J. S. Deneva, Keith C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, Wynn C. G. Ho, James M. Lattimer, Michael Loewenstein, R. M. Ludlam, C. B. Markwardt, Takashi Okajima, Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, Ronald A. Remillard, M. T. Wolff, Emanuel Fonseca, H. Thankful Cromartie, M. Kerr, Timothy T. Pennucci, A. Parthasarathy, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, L. Guillemot, I. Cognard

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillisecond pulsarPulsarPhysicsAstrophysicsMillisecondSpectroscopyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Posterior sample files associated with the preprint "A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio-Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy" by Riley et al. (2021; arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE]; submitted to ApJL).\n\nAlso included are: the data products; the numeric model files including the telescope calibration products; model modules in the Python language using the X-PSI framework; and Jupyter analysis notebooks.\n\nPlease refer to the README for detailed information.\n\n \n\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.072

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207