Synthetic Fluid Inclusions XXIV. In situ Monitoring of the Carbonation of Olivine Under Conditions Relevant to Carbon Capture and Storage Using Synthetic Fluid Inclusion Micro-Reactors: Determination of Reaction Rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultramafic and mafic rocks are possible targets for CO 2 sequestration via mineral carbonation. The determination of reaction kinetics and the factors that control mineralization are important in order to understand and predict how fast injected CO 2 will react with host rocks to permanently isolate and store the carbon. Here we present experimental results of olivine carbonation experiments using synthetic fluid inclusions (SFI) as micro-reactors. The micro-reactor technique coupled with non-destructive Raman spectroscopy allows us to monitor the reaction progress in situ and in real time at elevated temperatures (50–200°C) and pressures (several 10's to a few hundred bars), and quantify the amount of CO 2 consumed in the reaction using the Raman CO 2 densimeter and mass-balance calculations. Results show a measurable decrease of CO 2 density in the fluid inclusions as a result of the reaction between the CO 2 -bearing seawater-like aqueous solution and olivine. Magnesite formation was observed within hours at ≥100°C, while at 50°C magnesite nucleation and precipitation was only observed after a few weeks. Raman mapping and FIB-SEM analysis confirmed the formation of a non-continuous Si-rich layer on the inclusion wall and the presence of ferroan magnesite as a reaction product. Reaction rates [log J (mol/m −2 s −1 )] obtained for olivine carbonation range between ~-8.4 at 50°C and −4.7 at 200°C, which is sufficiently rapid to be suitable for commercial CO 2 injection projects. Reaction rates involving a seawater-like fluid were similar to rates published for high salinity solutions containing NaHCO 3 , and were faster compared to rates involving solutions with low salinity. Thus, CO 2 injection into submarine environments might offer some advantages over CO 2 storage in onshore basalts where the pores are likely to be filled with low salinity meteoric water. The application of the synthetic fluid inclusion technique, combined with non-destructive analytical techniques, is a promising tool to monitor rates of fluid-rock reactions in situ and in real time. Here, we have documented its application to experimentally study carbonation reactions in the olivine-H 2 O-CO 2 -NaCl-MgCl 2 system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".