MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208241117 · doi:10.4000/nrt.10113

Michael L. Siciliano, Creative Control. The ambivalence of work in the culture industries, Columbia University Press, 2021, 300 p.

2021· article· en· W3208241117 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Lamoureux

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Nouvelle revue du travail · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbivalenceWork (physics)Control (management)Columbia universityMedia studiesSociologyManagementPsychologyPsychoanalysisEngineeringEconomicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dire que le travail postfordiste est « ambivalent », cela relève de l’évidence, depuis les premières analyses des marxistes autonomistes sur les mutations du travail, à la fin des années 1990, et surtout depuis le texte de Paolo Virno (1996) qui a introduit le mot pour la première fois. Mais au-delà de la répétition de la formule, qui tourne parfois au cliché, il reste à savoir précisément ce qui est « ambivalent » au sein du procès de travail postfordiste. Est-ce la nouvelle autonomie des tr...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Nouvelle revue du travailSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207