MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208246097 · doi:10.1155/2021/9665340

Dynamic Capacitated Arc Routing Problem in E-Bike Sharing System: A Monte Carlo Tree Search Approach

2021· article· en· W3208246097 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shiqi Tan, Zhiheng Li, Na Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)Mathematical optimizationMarkov decision processProcess (computing)Tree (set theory)Monte Carlo methodOperations researchMonte Carlo tree searchMarkov processEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies a dynamic capacitated arc routing problem for battery replacement in an e-bike sharing system, where workers replace batteries for underpowered e-bikes along street segments dynamically. The objective is to replace as many batteries as possible and minimize pickup failures. The temporal dependency of the routing decisions, the conflict of the workers’ operations, and the stochastic and dynamic nature of user demands all make this a difficult problem. To cope with these difficulties, a “Partition-First, Route-Second” bi-level solution framework is adopted to describe the problem in two different time scales. On the large time scale, a spatiotemporal partitioning method, which divides the road network into nonoverlapping subzones, is proposed to decompose the problem. On the small time scale, this paper models the routing decision process of individual worker as a Markov Decision Process. We adopt a lookahead policy that simulates future information and decisions over some horizons to evaluate the long-term influence of current feasible decisions. A Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm is also used to improve the simulation efficiency. By performing numerical computation experiments on a test case study and comparing with some benchmarking policies, we demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the suggested method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207