MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3208257229 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3047

Characterizing the PAH emission in the Orion Bar

2021· preprint· en· W3208257229 on OpenAlexafffund
Collin Knight, E. Peeters, A. G. G. M. Tielens, William D. Vacca

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersDivision of Loan RepaymentData Storage InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversities Space Research AssociationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversität StuttgartCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion Laboratory
KeywordsSpectrographPhysicsAstrophysicsIonizationNeonInfraredObservatoryPhotodissociationSpitzer Space TelescopeSpectral lineChemistryArgonAstronomyTelescopeAtomic physicsPhotochemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present 5–14 $\mu$m spectra at two different positions across the Orion Bar photodissociation region (PDR) obtained with the Infrared Spectrograph onboard the Spitzer Space Telescope and 3.3 $\mu$m PAH observations obtained with the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA). We aim to characterize emission from Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH), dust, atomic and molecular hydrogen, argon, sulfur, and neon as a function of distance from the primary illuminating source. We find that all the major PAH bands peak between the ionization front and the PDR front, as traced by H2, while variations between these bands become more pronounced moving away from this peak into the face-on PDRs behind the PDR front and at the backside of the H ii region. While the relative PAH intensities are consistent with established PAH characteristics, we report unusual behaviours and attribute these to the PDR viewing angle and the strength of the FUV radiation field impinging on the PDRs. We determine the average PAH size which varies across the Orion Bar. We discuss subtle differences seen between the cationic PAH bands and highlight the photochemical evolution of carbonaceous species in this PDR environment. We find that PAHs are a good tracer of environmental properties such as the strength of the FUV radiation field and the PAH ionization parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→