MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208261539

French and Belgian large African dam projects, 1954-1960. Nationalisms, Eurafrica, or pan-Africanism?

2018· article· en· W3208261539 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Bruno Mukanya Kaninda-Muana

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations internationales · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecolonizationSovereigntyIndependence (probability theory)ColonialismCapitalismPoliticsPower (physics)HydroelectricityPolitical sciencePolitical economyEconomySociologyDevelopment economicsEconomicsLawEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Refreshed after the Second World War, French and Belgian African dam projects were the flagship initiative for both euro-African and African integration, benefitting from an exceptional convergence of stimulating factors. But, due to their extroversion, and to the opposing interests of the forces involved that even the IBRD was unable to reconcile, they never led to any integration through hydroelectric power in Africa. Moreover, Canadian and American neoliberal demands for political and economic stability in the colonies in order to guarantee their investments, along with France and Belgium’s concerns over maintaining sovereignty through colonial capitalism, aimed at protecting national interests and consolidating the Empires, meant that the African factor was forgotten in all of this. However, when decolonization moved forward, Africa profoundly influenced the game, forcing players to adjust their strategies. Independence threw away the dream of African integration through hydroelectric power, with the international dam projects changing into instruments of unequal cooperation between the West and the newly independent African States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations internationalesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207