Self-Consistent Auxiliary Density Perturbation Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The working equations for the extension of auxiliary density perturbation theory (ADPT) to hybrid functionals, employing the variational fitting of the Fock potential, are derived. The response equations in the resulting self-consistent ADPT (SC-ADPT) are solved iteratively with an adapted Eirola-Nevanlinna algorithm. As a result, a memory and CPU time efficient implementation of perturbation theory free of four-center electron repulsion integrals (ERIs) is obtained. Our validation calculations of SC-ADPT static and dynamic polarizabilities show quantitative agreement with corresponding coupled perturbed Hartree-Fock and Kohn-Sham results employing four-center ERIs. The comparison of SC-ADPT hybrid functional polarizabilities with coupled cluster reference calculations yield semiquantitative agreement. The presented systematic study of the dynamic polarizabilities of oligothiophenes shows that hybrid functionals can overcome the pathological misplacement of excitation poles by the local density and generalized gradient approximations. Good agreement with experimental dynamic polarizabilities for all studied oligothiophenes is achieved with range-separated hybrid functionals in the framework of SC-ADPT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".