MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208309832 · doi:10.1029/2021gb006977

Iron Isotope Biogeochemical Cycling in the Western Arctic Ocean

2021· article· en· W3208309832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruifeng Zhang, Laramie T. Jensen, Jessica N. Fitzsimmons, Robert M. Sherrell, Phoebe J. Lam, Yang Xiang, Seth G. John

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotracesBiogeochemical cycleOceanographyArcticSeawaterCanada BasinGeologyContinental shelfCyclingGeochemical cycleTransectEnvironmental chemistryGeochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Arctic Ocean is unique, connecting the Atlantic and Pacific basins and being especially vulnerable to the impacts of a changing climate. Iron stable isotopes (δ 56 Fe) provide a unique window into the biogeochemical cycling of Fe in the Arctic. Here we present the first seawater δ 56 Fe for the Western Arctic Ocean, from the 2015 U.S. GEOTRACES GN01 transect. Samples analyzed for δ 56 Fe include seawater dissolved (<0.2 μm), soluble (<∼0.003 μm), and leachable particulate phases. Several key processes were explored using Fe isotopes, each characterized by a distinct combination of δ 56 Fe and Fe concentrations. Input of Fe from reducing continental shelf sediments was characterized by high dissolved Fe concentrations (6.18 ± 4.84 nmol kg −1 ) and low δ 56 Fe (−1.57 ± 0.66‰). Riverine Fe input observed in the Transpolar Drift Current was characterized by high Fe concentrations corresponding to a riverine end‐member Fe concentration of 19 nM, and near‐zero δ 56 Fe (0.02 ± 0.23‰) that was similar to that of average crustal material. The deep Arctic was mostly characterized by low Fe concentrations (0.33 ± 0.14 nmol kg −1 ) and slightly higher δ 56 Fe (0.05 ± 0.30‰), except for samples taken near continental slopes that were affected by sedimentary Fe input with lower δ 56 Fe, and in the Amundsen Basin which showed possible hydrothermal Fe input. Our data thus illuminate Fe biogeochemical cycling processes in the modern Arctic Ocean, and serve as a baseline for understanding how the Arctic Fe cycle responds to climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207