MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208419860 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.382

RF-274 Cardiorespiratory fitness of police recruits: Norm-referenced values and 14-year temporal trend.

2021· article· en· W3208419860 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. Poirier, Julie Houle, François Trudeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessIncidence (geometry)MedicineDemographyPhysical fitnessInternal medicinePhysical therapyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Many have highlighted the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) among police officers. Because a low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in young adulthood is associated with a higher risk of CVD incidence, the identification of police officers exhibiting low CRF upon entry in the profession could allow the implementation of targeted strategies for the primary prevention of CVD. Unfortunately, reference values for the CRF of Canadian police recruits are not yet available. <h3>Objectives</h3> This research aimed to provide reference standards for the CRF of police recruits in Québec (Canada) and to evaluate the trend in the CRF of recruits over a 14-year period. <h3>Methods</h3> This cross-sectional study was divided into two research phases. First, fifty-one police cadets performed both an indirect calorimetry assessment of their maximal oxygen consumption (&amp;Vdot;O2max) and the Physical Abilities Test (PAT) used for the recruitment of police officers in the province of Québec. Using results from both tests, a model was developed to estimate &amp;Vdot;O<sub>2</sub>max based on PAT results. The CRF of police recruits who completed the PAT from 2004 to 2017 was then retrospectively assessed using the previously developed model. <h3>Results</h3> Based on the analysis of 7234 PAT results, the average &amp;Vdot;O<sub>2</sub>max was 53.33 ± 2.90 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup> for male recruits and 43.78 ± 2.89 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup> for female recruits. Furthermore, bivariate correlation analyses suggested small but significant increases in the &amp;Vdot;O<sub>2</sub>max of both male (r<sub>s</sub> = .105, p &lt; .001) and female recruits (r<sub>s</sub> = .125, p &lt; .001) over the 14-year period studied. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our results suggest that the CRF of police recruits in Québec is considerably higher than their North American peers. Furthermore, although clear conclusions cannot be drawn from our temporal trend analyses, our data suggest that the CRF of police officers from this population did not decline over the last decades as previously suggested by others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOccupational Health and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207