Aerosol Activation in Radiation Fog at the Atmospheric Radiation Program Southern Great Plains Site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Environmental supersaturation is a key parameter in the formation of fog and clouds, yet it cannot be measured directly and must be inferred. Calculating the ambient supersaturation in fog requires knowledge of the aerosol hygroscopicity as well as particle size distribution, and relatively few values have been reported in the literature. Here we use κ‐Köhler theory to derive aerosol activation properties based on particle hygroscopicity and dry particle size distributions, and then estimate the effective peak supersaturation during eight cases of radiative fog at the Southern Great Plains site in rural north‐central Oklahoma, USA. The mean hygroscopicity parameter κ of particles likely to act as cloud condensation nuclei varied from 0.14 to 0.43. Ambient effective peak supersaturation during the fog episodes was between 0.01%–0.07%, with most values below 0.04%. The minimum 50% dry activation diameter generally ranged between 300–400 nm with little activation of particles with diameters below 300 nm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".