Towards All-optical Stochastic Computing Using Photonic Crystal Nanocavities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stochastic computing allows a drastic reduction in hardware complexity using serial processing of bit streams. While the induced high computing latency can be overcome using integrated optics technology, the design of realistic optical stochastic computing architectures calls for energy efficient switching devices. Photonics Crystal (PhC) nanocavities are μm 2 scale devices offering 100fJ switching operation under picoseconds-scale switching speed. Fabrication process allows controlling the Quality factor of each nanocavity resonance, leading to opportunities to implement architectures involving cascaded gates and multi-wavelength signaling. In this paper, we investigate the design of cascaded gates architecture using nanocavities in the context of stochastic computing. We propose a transmission model considering key nanocavity device parameters, such as Quality factors, resonance wavelength, and switching efficiency. The model is calibrated with experimental measurements. We propose the design of XOR gate and multiplexer. We illustrate the use of the gates to design an edge detection filter. System-level exploration of laser power, bit-stream length and bit-error rate is carried out for the processing of gray-scale images. The results show that the proposed architecture leads to 8.5nJ/pixel energy consumption and 512ns/pixel processing time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it