MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208576583 · doi:10.1109/iccvw54120.2021.00152

From RGB to NIR: Predicting of near infrared reflectance from visible spectrum aerial images of crops

2021· article· en· W3208576583 on OpenAlexaff
Masoomeh Aslahishahri, Kevin G. Stanley, Hema Duddu, Steven J. Shirtliffe, Sally Vail, Kirstin E. Bett, Curtis Pozniak, Ian Stavness

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageRGB color modelRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceNear-infrared spectroscopyContext (archaeology)Precision agricultureSpectral bandsComputer visionVNIREnvironmental scienceGeographyOpticsAgricultureHyperspectral imagingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIR) provides rich information in agricultural operations and experiments to determine crop parameters which are not visible to the human eye. Collecting the NIR spectral band requires a multispectral camera which is typically more expensive and has lower resolution than a comparable RGB camera. We investigate image-to-image translation as a means to generate an NIR spectral band from an RGB image alone in aerial crop imagery. Aerial images were captured via a multispectral sensor mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flown over canola, lentil, dry bean, and wheat breeding trials. A software workflow was created to preprocess raw aerial images creating a dataset suitable for training and evaluating deep learning based band inferencing algorithms. Two different experiments including in-domain and out-of-domain experiments over different crop types in our dataset were conducted to evaluate efficacy in an agricultural context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207