Optimizing Information Freshness for MEC-Enabled Cooperative Autonomous Driving
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fully automated vehicles deployed with high computational/perceptive capabilities will soon become a reality. Such capabilities enable the cooperation among vehicles and the realization of interacting autonomous driving systems. Edge computing has emerged to provide a plethora of computational services to reduce network latency. Applications at the edge that apply analytics on the sensory data are therefore indispensable for self-driving vehicles. We consider in this paper a network that interconnects vehicles to an edge server at a roadside unit. Each vehicle extracts multiple information by sampling multiple processes and sends them to the corresponding edge application. To make timely decisions, “fresh” information needs to be offloaded, processed, and delivered back to vehicles; in this context, we adopt a new metric called Age of Information (AoI) that has been lately used to measure the freshness of information. We seek to jointly schedule vehicles’ transmission of information and schedule information processing at the edge to minimize the AoI of all processes. We mathematically formulate the problem and prove its NP-Hardness. To overcome this hardness, we propose a logic-based Benders decomposition to divide the problem into a master and several subproblems. Then, we present an exact polynomial-time solution for the subproblems, a scalable heuristic for the master, and devise a valid yet efficient Benders cut. We implement the system simulation on the well-known traffic simulator SUMO and compare the decomposition with CPLEX branch-and-cut; Although the problem is highly intricate, our method finds a near-optimal solution (maximum deviation is 7% from optimal solution) with a speedup that reaches 95%. We study the system performance by varying different system parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".