MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208711628 · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3119961

Optimizing Information Freshness for MEC-Enabled Cooperative Autonomous Driving

2021· article· en· W3208711628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduleEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionScalabilityHeuristicContext (archaeology)Metric (unit)Distributed computingMathematical optimizationEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fully automated vehicles deployed with high computational/perceptive capabilities will soon become a reality. Such capabilities enable the cooperation among vehicles and the realization of interacting autonomous driving systems. Edge computing has emerged to provide a plethora of computational services to reduce network latency. Applications at the edge that apply analytics on the sensory data are therefore indispensable for self-driving vehicles. We consider in this paper a network that interconnects vehicles to an edge server at a roadside unit. Each vehicle extracts multiple information by sampling multiple processes and sends them to the corresponding edge application. To make timely decisions, “fresh” information needs to be offloaded, processed, and delivered back to vehicles; in this context, we adopt a new metric called Age of Information (AoI) that has been lately used to measure the freshness of information. We seek to jointly schedule vehicles’ transmission of information and schedule information processing at the edge to minimize the AoI of all processes. We mathematically formulate the problem and prove its NP-Hardness. To overcome this hardness, we propose a logic-based Benders decomposition to divide the problem into a master and several subproblems. Then, we present an exact polynomial-time solution for the subproblems, a scalable heuristic for the master, and devise a valid yet efficient Benders cut. We implement the system simulation on the well-known traffic simulator SUMO and compare the decomposition with CPLEX branch-and-cut; Although the problem is highly intricate, our method finds a near-optimal solution (maximum deviation is 7% from optimal solution) with a speedup that reaches 95%. We study the system performance by varying different system parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it