MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208741333 · doi:10.3390/jpm11111125

Vital Pulp Therapy in Permanent Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis Caused by Caries: A Prospective Cohort Study

2021· article· en· W3208741333 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Personalized Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
KeywordsMedicinePulpitisDentistryPermanent teethPulp (tooth)Prospective cohort studyExact testEndodonticsEndodontic therapyPosterior teethApical foramenPulpectomyRoot canalSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: When a tooth is diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis, root canal therapy (RCT) is generally performed to completely remove pulp tissue, which might lead to a higher risk of loss of vascularity, and teeth being more prone to fracture. Vital pulp therapy (VPT) is a personalized method of treating irreversible pulpitis, which conforms to the trend of minimally invasive endodontics. The remaining vital pulp could promote the physiological development of the roots of young permanent teeth with incomplete apical foramen. However, clear guidelines for VPT indication are still missing. Objective: This prospective cohort study evaluated the outcomes of vital pulp therapy (VPT) using iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix Inc, Vancouver, BC, Canada) in permanent teeth of 6- to 20-year-old patients with irreversible pulpitis caused by caries and analyzed the preoperative factors affecting VPT prognosis. Methods: Fifty-nine permanent teeth in 59 patients with irreversible pulpitis caused by caries were treated with VPT using iRoot BP Plus. All patients received VPT under a standardized protocol. After informed consent, teeth were isolated with a dental dam, then operators performed VPT with iRoot BP Plus and restored the teeth with composite resin or stainless steel crown. Patients were postoperatively recalled after 3, 6 and 12 months and then recalled annually. Successful cases were defined as successful in both clinical and radiographic evaluations. A statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test, and the level of significant difference was p < 0.05. Results: After 6–36 months of follow-up, a total of 57 teeth from 57 patients were accessible for evaluation. The mean age of subjects was 11.75 ± 3.81 years. The overall clinical and radiographic success rate of VPT was 91.2% (52/57). With an observation time of one year or more, the success rate was 90.5% (38/42). All the symptoms and physical examination findings showed no significant effect on VPT prognosis (p > 0.05) using a binary logistic regression model. Conclusions: Permanent teeth in 6- to 20-year-old patients diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis caused by caries can be successfully treated with VPT using iRoot BP Plus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it