In Vivo Pulsatility Measurement of Cerebral Microcirculation in Rodents Using Dynamic Ultrasound Localization Microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An increased pulse pressure, due to arteries stiffening with age and cardiovascular disease, may lead to downstream brain damage in microvessels and cognitive decline. Brain-wide imaging of the pulsatility propagation from main feeding arteries to capillaries in small animals could improve our understanding of the link between pulsatility and cognitive decline. However, it requires higher spatiotemporal resolution and penetration depth than currently available with existing brain imaging techniques. Herein, we show the feasibility of performing Dynamic Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (DULM), a novel imaging approach to capture hemodynamics with a subwavelength resolution. By producing cine-loops of flowing microbubbles in 2D in the whole rodent brain lasting several cardiac cycles, DULM performed pulsatility measurements in microvessels in-depth, in vivo, with and without craniotomy. Cortical veins and arteries were shown to have a significatively different pulsatility index and the method was compared against Contrast Enhanced Ultrafast Ultrasound Doppler (CEUFD) pulsatility measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".