Identification and optimization of molecular glue compounds that inhibit a noncovalent E2 enzyme–ubiquitin complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pharmacological control of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is of intense interest in drug discovery. Here, we report the development of chemical inhibitors of the ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) enzyme CDC34A (also known as UBE2R1), which donates activated ubiquitin to the cullin-RING ligase (CRL) family of ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes. A FRET-based interaction assay was used to screen for novel compounds that stabilize the noncovalent complex between CDC34A and ubiquitin, and thereby inhibit the CDC34A catalytic cycle. An isonipecotamide hit compound was elaborated into analogs with ~1000-fold increased potency in stabilizing the CDC34A-ubiquitin complex. These analogs specifically inhibited CDC34A-dependent ubiquitination in vitro and stabilized an E2~ubiquitin thioester reaction intermediate in cells. The x-ray crystal structure of a CDC34A-ubiquitin-inhibitor complex uncovered the basis for analog structure-activity relationships. The development of chemical stabilizers of the CDC34A-ubiquitin complex illustrates a general strategy for de novo discovery of molecular glue compounds that stabilize weak protein interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".