Energy-Efficient Ground Traversability Mapping Based on UAV-UGV Collaborative System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the development of science and technology, robots have been widely used in smart cities. The traversability mapping of environment perception is the prerequisite for robots to perform tasks. To save the energy consumption of traversability mapping for unmanned ground vehicle (UGV), we fusion a wide range of aerial images and a small amount of ground images to provide vision for UGV. Current map fusion methods are usually constrained by homogeneous model of robotic systems and lack of diverse sensors. As a result, they cannot work well in heterogeneous collaborative robotic systems that consist of aerial and ground robots. In this paper, we use heterogeneous robot systems, including UGV and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to build an occupancy grid map that can be used for navigation. To fuse sensor data of different types, we propose a Collaborative Map Fusion algorithm based on Multi-task Gaussian Process Classification (MTGPC) using heterogeneous robotic systems. Besides, probabilistic model is exploited in traversability mapping, so the active perception can be used to build the map efficiently. Our system is tested in real scenes and can achieve an accuracy of more than 70%. The map fusion using active perception is better than map fusion using random strategy in terms of speed and accuracy. To our knowledge, this is the first work that can build the occupancy grid map using sparse data points sampled from aerial images and ground lidar map.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it