MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208807808

The Schooled Society: New Innovations in Education

2010· article· en· W3208807808 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueTRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegitimacySociologySociology of EducationOrder (exchange)Social orderSocial sciencePublic relationsPolitical scienceLawEconomicsPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Sociology of Education course has two main topics. First, it examines how forms of schooling have spread into different social institutions. The criminal justice system and the business world, for instance, have both embraced types of education to an increasing extent in order to achieve their institutional goals. Second, this course investigates the emergence of various innovations within regular education. Older innovations such as Alternative and Free schools have been joined by the rise of private and for-profit schooling and homeschooling. Taken together, these trends illustrate how Aschool@ in various guises pervades our lives more than ever. We now live in a Aschooled society.@ To understand these two trends, we will examine many different examples of sociological research, and will develop a theoretical framework to understand why school forms are appealing to various social groups, from professionals to parents, and why they have such legitimacy in our culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.023
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for SociologySame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207