Mechanical Properites Of Fiber Laser Welded And Friction Stir (Spot) Welded Lightweight Alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mechanical properties of fiber laser welded (FLWed), friction stir welded (FSWed), and friction stir spot welded (FSS weld) AZ31B-H24 Mg and Al 5754 alloys were studied. After welding, grains at the weld centre became recrystallized. β-Mg17A112 particles appeared in the fusion zone of the joints during laser welding, while a characteristic interfacial layer consisting of A112Mg17 and Al3Mg2 was observed in the A1/Mg dissimilar FSS weld. In FLWed joints, a joint efficiency of ~91% with superior yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and fatigue strength was achieved at a higher welding speed. In FSWed joints, a higher welding speed of 20 mm/s and lower rotational rate of 1000 rpm led to higher YS, but lower ductility, strain-hardening exponent and hardening capacity. In FSS weld joints, Mg/Mg, A1/A1 FSS welds and Al/Mg adhesive, Mg/A1 adhesive FSS welds had a significantly higher lap shear strength and fatigue life than the A1/Mg FSS weld.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".