MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3208844634 · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01429-6

Publisher Correction: Multidimensional natal isotopic niches reflect migratory patterns in birds

2021· erratum· en· W3208844634 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandro Franzoi, Stefano Larsen, Pietro Franceschi, Keith A. Hobson, Paolo Pedrini, Federica Camin, Luana Bontempo

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcological nicheNicheBiologyGeographyZoologyEvolutionary biologyEcologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 1 where the labels for the species and individuals were missing from the distributions. The original Figure 1 and accompanying legend appear below. Figure 1 Distribution of each species and individuals over the δ 13 C- δ 15 N isotope space defining the dietary niche. Grey crosses in the background show the overall space occupied by the species (acronyms provided in Table S1). TSM Trans-Saharan migrants, IPM Intra-Palearctic migrants, IRM Irruptive migrants. Full size image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0060.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→