A package for the automated classification of images containing supernova light echoes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context.The so-called light echoes of supernovae – the apparent motion of outburst-illuminated interstellar dust – can be detected in astronomical difference images; however, light echoes are extremely rare which makes manual detection an arduous task. Surveys for centuries-old supernova light echoes can involve hundreds of pointings of wide-field imagers wherein the subimages from each CCD amplifier require examination. Aims.We introduce ALED, a Python package that implements (i) a capsule network trained to automatically identify images with a high probability of containing at least one supernova light echo and (ii) routing path visualization to localize light echoes and/or light echo-like features in the identified images. Methods.We compared the performance of the capsule network implemented in ALED (ALED-m) to several capsule and convolutional neural networks of different architectures. We also applied ALED to a large catalogue of astronomical difference images and manually inspected candidate light echo images for human verification. Results.ALED-m was found to achieve 90% classification accuracy on the test set and to precisely localize the identified light echoes via routing path visualization. From a set of 13 000+ astronomical difference images, ALED identified a set of light echoes that had been overlooked in manual classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".