MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208932422 · doi:10.25103/jestr.144.05

High -speed Train Running Safety under Random Wind Effect

2021· article· en· W3208932422 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Science and Technology Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAnhui UniversityAnhui University of Science and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringWind speedComputer scienceEngineeringMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aerodynamic performance of the high-speed train deteriorates in the strong wind environment when the railway vehicles have been made increasingly lighter to reach higher speeds, affecting their running safety. To explore the differences in the running safety of high-speed trains under different wind load models, the time history curve of random wind was simulated considering the random characteristic of wind using the discretizing and synthesizing random flow generation method based on the Von-Karman spectrum. Next, the aerodynamic characteristics of trains were solved and analyzed using the Star-CCM+ solver through the improved delayed detached eddy simulation technique. On this basis, the indexes of the train running safety were compared and evaluated by using the multi-body system dynamics simulation software SIMPACK. Results demonstrate that the mean values of the aerodynamic load coefficients of trains under different wind fields have little difference. The pulsation of the random wind effect becomes stronger with the increase in the yaw angle. The standard deviation of the lateral force coefficient under random wind reaches 0.238 at the yaw angle of 20, greatly reflecting the aerodynamic load changes under the pulsation characteristics of a random wind effect. In terms of train running safety, the peak value of each index far exceeds the mean value under the random wind load, and the influence of the pulsation of random wind load on the train running safety indexes is enhanced with the increase in the yaw angle. When the yaw angle is 20, the peak value of the train overturning coefficient exceeds 68% of the mean value, indicating that sufficient safety margin should be reserved in the evaluation of train running safety, and it is more reasonable to evaluate train running safety under a random wind field. The change curves of the running safety indexes under random wind should be filtered, and the appropriate filtering frequency is 20 Hz. The proposed method provides a scientific basis for more accurately evaluating the train running safety under crosswind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it