MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209003362 · doi:10.4236/ti.2021.124011

The Viability and Contribution of High-Speed Rail to the Economic Growth and Social Development

2021· article· en· W3209003362 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jaby Mohammed, Fatima A. AlKhoori

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Investment · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbu dhabiPlan (archaeology)Master planBusinessFive year planEconomic growthTransport engineeringChinaEnvironmental planningEngineeringGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United Arab Emirates, located in the southwest of Asia, and Abu Dhabi, is the largest emirate in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The emirate comprises a total area of 87% of the UAE. In 2009, The Department of Transport (DoT) announced the Surface Master Plan: A vision for connecting Abu Dhabi in 2030. One of the significant economic objectives of the master plan is to boost economic competitiveness through effective freight and passengers transport services. The rapid development and growth in the emirate will result in a considerable increase in freight movement. Thus, investing in high-speed rail (HSR) projects is crucial to achieving the vision objectives. This study seeks to assess the impact of the Etihad High-Speed Rail (ER) project on the economy and sociability in the United Arab Emirates. In addition, the study will review the HSR project’s impact from different studies across the world. The aim will be to synthesize the current knowledge on the subject and draw on the best conditions in which the country can invest in HSR extensions and new projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology and InvestmentSame topicTransport and Economic PoliciesFrench-language works237,207