MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209021254 · doi:10.26522/tg.v4i0.2134

Rule Britannia

2019· article· en· W3209021254 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mark Parent

Bibliographic record

Venuethe general brock university Undergraduate journal of history · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShipbuildingPrideGeorgianGloryScheduleHistoryBill of ladingEconomic historyLawPolitical scienceEconomicsManagementAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Britain has always seemed to be the supreme ruler of the seas, so it might seem surprising that the British were falling behind when it came to ferrying passengers across the Atlantic in the early nineteenth century. Britain had found itself in second place to the Americans by the mid 1830s when it came to shipbuilding and cargo contracts; their shipbuilding techniques were outdated, which drove passengers to the larger and safer American built packets, and were sailing without fixed schedules, often finding themselves days or weeks behind schedule, often spoiling goods and upsetting passengers. Their national pride was at stake. This essay shows how a wealthy Canadian shipowner by the name of Samuel Cunard rewrote not only the rules of how shipowners managed their fleets, but also rejuvenated Britain’s maritime glory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuethe general brock university Undergraduate journal of historySame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207