MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209037222

The effects of automation on the environmental impact of deep underground metal ore mining operations

2020· dissertation· en· W3209037222 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Kyle Moreau

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMitacs
KeywordsAutomationIron oreMining engineeringUnderground mining (soft rock)EngineeringWaste managementArchaeologyGeographyCoal miningMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demand for increased production has resulted in the need to develop deeper underground mines to extract more resources. However, the mining process becomes less economically attractive as the ventilation and ore transportation costs drastically increase when operating at large depths. This has led to the industry investigating automated battery-electric and biodiesel fueled machinery instead of diesel machines to reduce emissions, and hence ventilation costs, as well improve productivity and thereby, the economic viability of deep mine projects. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach has been developed to evaluate the environmental impact from introducing automated equipment in underground copper mines. This is a novel application for an LCA, and as a gauge of model accuracy, it was found that calculated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for an underground mine site in Canada were within 5.6% of their reported emissions. The model was then expanded using data collected from automation trials at a Canadian mine to predict changes due to the introduction of various levels of automation with regards to the impact potentials of global warming, acidification, eutrophication and human toxicity. All impact levels were quantified and found to decrease due to automation. Data from this site study was then used to further develop the LCA model to predict changes in environmental impacts for underground copper mine sites in Australia, Canada, Poland, USA and Zambia. Site specific parameters and processes that contribute to their overall environmental impacts were identified, and the calculated CO2 emissions were within 4.2-5.6% of the reported values. The mining industry is moving toward introducing significantly more technology to enhance both productivity and safety. This thesis investigates using an LCA approach to add a third dimension; improved environmental impacts that contribute to more sustainable mining

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207