MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209046517 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1027597

cdeterman/gpuR: v2.0.0

2017· article· en· W3209046517 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Determan, Yixuan Qiu, Santiago Castro, Robert Cohn, mespadoto

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Version 2.0.0 API Changes: deviceType, gpuInfo, cpuInfo not longer accepts 'platform_idx' parameter as OpenCL contexts cannot contain more than one platform. New Features: Added functionality to create custom OpenCL functions from user provided kernels Added 'synchronize' function to assure completion of device calls (necessary for benchmarking) Added determinant function (det) Allow for gpuR object - base object interaction (e.g. vclMatrix * matrix) Added 'inplace' function for 'inplace' operations. These operations include '+', '-', '*', '/', 'sin', 'asin', 'sinh', 'cos', 'acos', 'cosh', 'tan', 'atan', 'tanh'. Added 'sqrt', 'sum', 'sign','pmin', and 'pmax' functions Methods to pass two gpuR matrix objects to 'cov' Added 'norm' method Added gpuRmatrix/gpuRvector Arith '+','-' methods Bug Fixes: Fixed incorrect device info when using different contexts Fixed Integer Matrix Multiplication All OpenCL devices will be initialized on startup (previous version occasionally would omit some devices)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2240.219

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207