MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209099035 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3124205

An Enhanced Algorithm for Conventional Protection Devices of Transmission Lines With DTLR

2021· article· en· W3209099035 on OpenAlexafffund
Elsaeed Ali, Andrew M. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Electric System Operator
KeywordsOvercurrentComputer scienceReliability engineeringMATLABTransmission lineElectric power transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)Scheme (mathematics)Protective relayLine (geometry)VoltageElectric power systemElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the installed capacity of renewable generation continues to increase nowadays to satisfy both emissions and economic requirements, the nature of intermittent generation results in a need to further increase transmission capacity. Dynamic thermal line rating may be used to increase the capacity of transmission lines without upgrading infrastructure. However, existing transmission line protection devices may mal-operate due to the increased capacity. So, it is required to evaluate the performance of existing protection devices. This paper proposes an algorithm that enhances the performance of existing conventional relays such as distance and overcurrent relays. The proposed algorithm is based on a combination of dynamic thermal rating, current ratio of negative and positive sequences and voltage criterion to detect faults whether symmetrical or asymmetrical and unsafe overload. In addition, it aims at restraining the existing relays during safe overloads. A model of a system under investigation is simulated, with studies are performed in MATLAB/Simulink environment. The results demonstrate the ability of the proposed scheme to detect all types of faults and unsafe overload dependably and restrain the conventional relays securely during safe overloads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionFrench-language works237,207