Noise Removal from ECG Signals by Adaptive Filter Based on Variable Step Size LMS Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal is widely used to detect cardiovascular diseases. Several studies are conducted on noise removal of ECG signal based on the adaptive filter with least-mean Square (LMS) algorithm. In this paper, for improving the traditional LMS method, the evolutionary algorithms are used to select the variable optimal step size of LMS, causing the least error between the main and filtered ECG signals. The proposed Adaptive Noise Cancellation System (ANC) includes Wavelet Transform and IIR-Notch filter to reduce the baseline Wander and Power Line Interference noises. Afterward, an additive white noise generator unit is employed to evaluate the performance of the three adaptive models involving GA-LMS, PSO-LMS, and GA-PSO-LMS algorithms in terms of Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and Mean Square Error (MSE). Eventually, to evaluate the performance of the proposed models in terms of the MSE and SNR criteria, we conduct comprehensive experiments on the ECG records of the MIT -BIH database. The obtained results of variable step size, GA-LMS, PSO-LMS, and hybrid GA-PSO-LMS, demonstrate more efficiency in filtered signal compared to constant step size LMS. Besides, in most cases, the Hybrid GA-PSO-LMS method has superiority over two other proposed methods concerning the SNR and MSE criteria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it