MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209117820 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2024.11.007

The effect of burning on the dissolution behaviour and silicon and oxygen isotope composition of phytolith silica

2024· article· en· W3209117820 on OpenAlexaff
A. J. Prentice, Elizabeth A. Webb

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSilicon Effects in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytolithDissolutionSiliconComposition (language)OxygenIsotopes of oxygenEnvironmental chemistryIsotopeChemistryGeologyGeochemistryOrganic chemistryArtEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The δ 30 Si and δ 18 O values of opal-A precipitated in plants (silica phytoliths) have been shown to be useful for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Here, the effects of burning and partial dissolution of phytoliths on their isotopic compositions and dissolution behaviour were examined. Phytoliths were heated to 700 °C and then dissolution experiments were conducted in batch reactors under a range of pH (4–8) and temperature (4–19 °C) conditions. Heating caused a −2.6 ‰ shift in phytolith δ 18 O values. NMR results suggest that heating reduces the number of surface vicinal silanols, which likely results in the formation of strained Si O Si bonds which incorporate oxygen from 18 O-depleted hydroxyl groups. During dissolution, the δ 18 O of burned phytoliths increased by up to 3.5 ‰ (average 1.8 ‰) until 15–45 % saturation was reached, and then adsorption of silica on the surface of the solid began to reduce the δ 18 O value of solid silica despite a net dissolution. The maximum increase in δ 18 O during dissolution of burned phytoliths is 1.8 ‰ smaller than previously observed for unburned silica subjected to partial dissolution under the same conditions. Heating did not cause a significant change in δ 30 Si values, and partial dissolution of burned phytoliths caused a slight increase in δ 30 Si values that was smaller in magnitude than for unburned phytoliths. Dissolution of burned phytoliths progressed more slowly than dissolution of fresh phytoliths in low pH and temperature conditions, but was faster than the dissolution of fresh phytoliths when pH > 6 and temperature = 19 °C. We propose that because fewer hydrolysis sites exist on the surface of burned phytoliths that the isolated silanols that remain after heating are difficult to deprotonate at low pH resulting in slower dissolution. However, at higher pH the breakage of strained Si O Si bonds in burned phytoliths may explain their higher dissolution rate relative to fresh phytoliths. We recommend caution in using the δ 18 O values of soil phytoliths in paleoclimate reconstructions as they can be altered during both heating and partial dissolution. For phytolith assemblages collected from archaeological hearths or grasslands prone to wildfires, the shift towards lower δ 18 O values caused by heating would result in overestimations of temperature using paleothermometer equations. Care must be taken to identify alteration by dissolution or burning, which may not always be visually evident.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaSame topicSilicon Effects in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207