MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209152046 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2021.3119670

Distributed Integral-Type Edge Event- and Self-Triggered Synchronization for Nonlinear Multiagent Systems

2021· article· en· W3209152046 on OpenAlexaff
Ming‐Zhe Dai, Chengxi Zhang, Henry Leung, Peng Dong, Bo Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLipschitz continuityEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionNonlinear systemSynchronization (alternating current)Zeno's paradoxesComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Type (biology)Event (particle physics)Multi-agent systemFunction (biology)MathematicsControl (management)Mathematical analysisArtificial intelligencePhysicsTelecommunicationsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents integral-type edge event- and self-triggered policies for Lipschitz nonlinear multiagent systems, in which only edge states are employed by all controllers. An integral-type triggering function is designed to determine event instants, and the considered system can achieve Zeno-free triggering. An integral-type edge self-triggered policy is then designed to avoid sensors’ continuous measurements. Compared to traditional event-triggered schemes, the proposed strategies have relaxed triggering conditions and lowered the event frequencies. Also, the proposed edge self-triggered algorithm can avoid the requirement for continuous measurement error monitoring. Numerical simulations are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the theoretical conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207