MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209187175 · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2021.339227

Revisiting Pierre Gy's formula (TOS) – A return to size-density classes for applications to contaminated soils, coated particular aggregates and mixed material systems

2021· article· en· W3209187175 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Sébastien Dubé, Kim H. Esbensen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytica Chimica Acta · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSampling (signal processing)Variance (accounting)StatisticsSoil waterChemistryStatistical physicsSample size determinationApplied mathematicsMathematicsSoil scienceEnvironmental sciencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For some real-world material systems, estimations of the incompressible sampling variance based on Gy's classical s2(FSE) formula from the Theory of Sampling (TOS) show a significant discrepancy with empirical estimates of sampling variance. In instances concerning contaminated soils, coated particular aggregates and mixed material systems, theoretical estimates of sampling variance are larger than empirical estimates, a situation which does not have physical meaning in TOS. This has led us to revisit the development of estimates of s2(FSE) from this famous constitutional heterogeneity equation and explore the use of size-density classes for mixed material systems (mixtures of both analyte-enriched and coated particles), an approach which has been mostly unused since Gy's original derivation. This approach makes it possible to avoid taking into account the granulometric and liberation factors from Gy's classical treatment, and present grounds for criticising the use of ‘standard’ input values of critical parameters such as f: = 0.5, and g: = 0.25. But, as always, the “liberation factor” (l) issue still plays an important role, which is paid due attention. The constitutional heterogeneity formula based on size-density classes is presented in a form that allows for easy implementation in practice, within specified limitations. We present extensive experimental results from real-world systems. Using the “SDCD model” with published data reproduced the relative sampling variances calculated for the standard “mineral-like matrices”, but more importantly corrected the relative sampling variance calculated for real contaminants by several orders of magnitudes. In all cases, the recalculated relative sampling variances were decreased to below their corresponding experimental measurements, now fully as expected from TOS, substantiating our development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytica Chimica ActaSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207