Bibliographic record
Abstract
Of all the seeds breeding Canadian poetry to the literary garden, Yeats’s direct and indirect influences on representative post-WWI poets and literary movements in Canada cannot be dismissed. This essay attempts to trace Yeats’s North American lecture tours (1903-4), still quite unremarked in Yeats Studies, and to examine how these lectures in some Canadian cities inspired the writers still striving to find a national, poetic voice. As in the works of G.D. Roberts and Bliss Carman, countless allusions and deliberate references to Yeats and his work pervade the Confederation verses. The literary cradle in Lower Canada, McGill University in Montreal, produced influential Canadian modernist poets, the McGill Group with Smith as a representative, with programmatic introductions of modernism into Canadian poetry in small magazines and literary journals such as McGill Fortnightly Review, edited by A.J.M. Smith and F. R. Scott. Smith particularly infuses the previous Confederation style with Irish modernist techniques into the poetic innovation. Smith’s own work is highly reminiscent of Yeats for the Yeatsian principle of versification and fervent speeches. This essay thus aims to pick up these threads and weave onto the literary fabric the Canadian modernist verse influenced by Yeats’s work and the Irish literary renaissance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".