Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассматриваются символические структуры наполеоновского мифа, касающиеся пребывания свергнутого императора на острове Св. Елены. Устойчивый символический комплекс, сложившийся в европейской поэзии, проник в русскую поэзию, которая осмысляла его по-своему, одно перенимая практически без изменений, другое категорически отвергая. Рассмотрение ряда известных поэтических текстов первой четверти XIX - первой трети XX вв., позволило показать преемственность образов, сформировавших в русской поэзии данную часть наполеоновского мифа. The article examines the symbolic structures of the Napoleonic myth concerning the stay of the deposed emperor on the island of St. Helena. The stable symbolic complex that developed in European poetry penetrated into Russian poetry, which interpreted it in its own way, adopting one thing virtually unchanged and categorically rejecting another. Consideration of a number of well-known poetic texts of the first quarter of the 19 century - the first third of the 20century made it possible to show the continuity of the images that formed this part of the Napoleonic myth in Russian poetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".