Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The use of consumer cameras fitted with extreme wide‐angle (EWA) lenses for photogrammetric measurement is increasing. Conventional modelling of EWA systems relies on the pinhole camera model and up to five radial lens distortion terms. Aiming to reduce model complexity, this paper reports on an investigation into an alternate approach using fisheye lens models for EWA systems, despite them not falling strictly into the fisheye category. Four fisheye models were tested on four different cameras under laboratory conditions. The self‐calibration results show superior model fit for all fisheye models over the pinhole‐plus‐radial model in terms of residual RMS. The number of radial distortion terms required for the fisheye models was lower in all cases, so model complexity was reduced. Independent assessment revealed very similar 3D reconstruction accuracy for all models. The results suggest that fisheye modelling is an advantageous alternative for EWA lens systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it