MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209241819 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100875

RHybridFinder: An R package to process immunopeptidomic data for putative hybrid peptide discovery

2021· article· en· W3209241819 on OpenAlexafffund
Frederic Saab, David Hamelin, Qing Ma, Kevin A. Kovalchik, Isabelle Sirois, Pouya Faridi, Chen Li, Anthony W. Purcell, Peter Kubiniok, Étienne Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of OttawaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut de Valorisation des DonnéesFondation Charles-BruneauCanada Foundation for InnovationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChung Hua UniversityVictorian Cancer Agency
KeywordsComputational biologyR packageComputer scienceProtocol (science)InferencePeptideMajor histocompatibility complexSoftware packageIdentification (biology)Database search engineSoftwareCombinatorial chemistryBioinformaticsChemistryBiologyGeneticsBiochemistryProgramming languageGeneSearch engineInformation retrievalArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identification of proteasomal spliced peptides (PSPs) by mass spectrometry (MS) is not possible with traditional search engines. Here, we provide a protocol for running RHybridFinder (RHF), an R package for the computational inference of putative PSPs detected by MS. RHF extracts high confidence scored de novo sequenced peptides identified by PEAKS software. Those peptides are then matched to protein databases to infer cis- or trans-spliced major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-associated peptides. RHF is relatively fast and straightforward. PSPs have to be validated experimentally. For complete details on the use and execution of the original protocol, please refer to Faridi et al. (2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207