MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of Fluid Diffusivity in the Spatiotemporal Migration of Induced Earthquakes during Hydraulic Fracturing in Unconventional Reservoirs

2021· article· en· W3209314633 on OpenAlexafffund
Gang Hui, Shengnan Chen, Zhangxin Chen, Guicheng Jing, Die Hu, Fei Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsGeologyHydraulic fracturingPoromechanicsInduced seismicityThermal diffusivityPetrophysicsShear (geology)Pore water pressureSeismologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Geotechnical engineeringStress fieldPetrologyPorous mediumPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydraulic-fracturing-induced earthquakes exhibit an intricate pattern in spatiotemporal migration with respect to stage completions of fracturing horizontal wells. The underlying physical mechanisms remain uncertain. This paper investigates two field cases to quantify the effects of fluid diffusivity on the spatiotemporal migration of induced earthquakes during fracturing stimulation in shale reservoirs. First, the double-couple component approach is employed to determine the focal mechanisms of mainshock events. The relation plot of earthquake magnitude–fault size as well as the spatial distribution of induced events are used together to characterize the fault distribution. Then, the tight rock analysis and triaxial compression experiments are conducted to determine the distinctive petrophysical and geomechanical properties of stimulated formations in both cases. The hydraulic diffusivity of fracturing fluids is then estimated from the spatiotemporal evolution of the seismicity fronts with respect to the fracturing sites. Finally, a poroelastic modeling and numerical simulation are performed to evaluate the time-dependent pore pressure diffusion and poroelastic stress perturbation during fracturing stimulations. Results suggest that the subvertical N–S-trending faults and NE45°-trending hydraulic fractures generate the fracture and fault networks in the M w 3.6 and M w 3.4 cases, providing geological evidence to account for the spatial distribution of induced earthquakes within the networks. The shear stress gradient G is calculated to be 0.21 MPa/km for the M w 3.6 case and −0.08 MPa/km for the M w 3.4 case, indicating downward and slightly upward shear growth. The observed seismicity migration defines the hydraulic diffusivity of 0.15 m 2 /s for the M w 3.6 event and 2 m 2 /s for the M w 3.4 event. The poroelastic simulation characterizes the time-dependent pore pressure and poroelastic stress changes, matching well with the spatiotemporal migration of induced earthquakes during and after fracturing stimulations. The increasing pore pressure is the first-order factor in fault reactivation. Different time lags between stage completions and induced earthquakes indicate distinctive fluid diffusivity within the hydraulic fracture and seismogenic fault networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207