MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209319420 · doi:10.1152/jn.00397.2021

An open-source application for the standardized burst identification from the integrated muscle sympathetic neurogram

2021· article· en· W3209319420 on OpenAlexafffund
Glen E. Foster, Brooke M. Shafer, Conan L. H. Shing

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BCCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMicroneurographyIsometric exerciseIntraclass correlationLatency (audio)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationReproducibilityComputer scienceHeart rateBlood pressureInternal medicineMathematicsBaroreflexStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The basic analysis of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) requires the identification of pulse-synchronous bursts from the integrated neurogram before standard MSNA metrics can be quantified. This process is a time-consuming task requiring an experienced microneurographer to visually identify and manually label bursts. We developed an open-source, cross-platform application permitting a standardized approach for sympathetic burst identification and present the performance of this application against a manual scorer under basal conditions and during sympathoexcitatory stresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207