MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209321152 · doi:10.1080/24745332.2021.1979904

Chronic cough: Investigations, management, current and future treatments

2021· article· en· W3209321152 on OpenAlex
Imran Satia, M. Wahab, Elena Kum, H. Kim, Peter Lin, Alan Kaplan, Paul Hernandez, Jean Bourbeau, Louis‐Philippe Boulet, Stephen K. Field

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversité LavalMcGill University Health CentreWestern UniversityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of TorontoCanadian Heart Research CentreMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic coughMedicineGabapentinIntensive care medicineAsthmaDiseasePhysical therapyInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic cough, defined as cough lasting 8 weeks or longer, is a condition for which there is currently no licensed treatment. Chronic cough affects approximately 16% of Canadian adults between the age of 45 and 85 years and is often associated with physical, social, and psychological impairments. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to highlight the investigations, management, current and future treatment options and mechanistic concepts underlying chronic cough. Assessments of chronic cough should include a detailed history and examination to identify potential causes and triggers. Conditions associated with chronic cough include ACE inhibitor use, smoking, asthma, non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and upper airways cough syndrome. The impact and severity of chronic cough can be assessed in clinic using subjective questionnaires. Persistent cough despite optimal treatment of the underlying condition is called refractory chronic cough (RCC). Persistent cough for which no underlying cause is found, is labeled unexplained chronic cough (UCC). If treatment of underlying disease is unsuccessful at controlling cough despite adequate duration and adherence to the treatment, neuromodulator treatments such as speech and language therapy and/or low dose opioid, gabapentin, and pregabalin may be therapeutic options. There is no licensed treatment for RCC/UCC but a new class of medication targeting the purinergic P2X3 receptor is currently under consideration for regulatory approval with other P2X3 antagonists in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical development. Approval of this new treatment class may represent a hopeful advancement for patients suffering with chronic cough.RÉSUMÉLa toux chronique, définie comme une toux qui dure huit semaines ou plus, est une affection pour laquelle il n'existe actuellement aucun traitement autorisé. La toux chronique affecte environ 16 % des adultes canadiens âgés de 45 à 85 ans et est souvent associée à des déficiences physiques, sociales et psychologiques. Le but de cette revue de l'état de l'art est de mettre en évidence les investigations, la prise en charge, les options de traitement actuelles et futures et les concepts mécanistes sous-jacents à la toux chronique. Les évaluations de la toux chronique devraient inclure un historique détaillé et un examen pour déterminer les causes et les déclencheurs potentiels. Les affections associées à la toux chronique comprennent l'utilisation d'inhibiteurs de l'ECA, le tabagisme, l'asthme, la bronchite éosinophile non asthmatique, le reflux gastro-oesophagien et le syndrome de toux des voies respiratoires supérieures. L'impact et la gravité de la toux chronique peuvent être évalués en clinique à l'aide de questionnaires subjectifs. Une toux persistante malgré un traitement optimal de l'affection sous-jacente est appelée toux chronique réfractaire (TCR). La toux persistante pour laquelle aucune cause sous-jacente n'est trouvée, est appelée toux chronique inexpliquée (TCI). Si le traitement de la maladie sous-jacente ne parvient pas à maîtriser la toux malgré une durée et une adhésion adéquates au traitement, les traitements par neuromodulateurs tels que l'orthophonie et/ou les opioïdes à faible dose, la gabapentine et la prégabaline peuvent être des options thérapeutiques. Il n'y a pas de traitement autorisé pour la TCR/TCI, mais une nouvelle classe de médicaments ciblant le récepteur purinergique P2X3 est actuellement à l'étude pour approbation réglementaire, avec d'autres antagonistes P2X3 en phase 2 et 3 de développement clinique. L'approbation de cette nouvelle classe de traitement peut représenter une avancée prometteuse pour les patients souffrant de toux chronique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it