L’expérience de transition vers le retour au travail de survivantes du cancer du sein âgées de moins de 50 ans après la fin des traitements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but de cette étude est d’explorer l’expérience de transition vers le retour au travail de survivantes du cancer du sein de moins de 50 ans. Huit survivantes ont participé à cette étude qualitative exploratoire. Les résultats de l’analyse de contenu itérative indiquent que ces survivantes veulent délaisser leur vie teintée par la maladie et réintégrer une vie « normale » incluant le retour au travail. La transition vers le retour au travail est aussi influencée par plusieurs facteurs d’ordre personnel, familial et sociétal qui peuvent faciliter ou entraver l’expérience. Enfin, plusieurs défis distincts et la présence d’une vulnérabilité plus marquée doivent être considérés par les professionnels de la santé pour mieux accompagner ces survivantes durant la transition vers le retour au travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".