História oral, desigualdades e diferenças
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Publicada com o selo das editoras das Universidades Federais de Pernambuco (Editora UFPE) e de Santa Catarina (EdUFSC), a obra e uma coletânea de textos sobre abordagens multidisciplinares e experimentacoes metodologicas da praxis da historia oral. Com a participacao de 16 autores de diversas instituicoes e no intercâmbio de pesquisas entre Brasil, Canada e Argentina, a producao discute as dimensoes da compreensao da oralidade e das fontes orais como um todo a partir dos processos de producao da cultura e da vida social, de modo a pensar historicamente as formas ambiguas e contraditorias de representacao do real, assim como as faces multiplas de traducao sociocultural. Tomando a historia oral como meio para aprender a heterogeneidade de experiencias e os conflitos nas relacoes sociais, o livro resulta em seis eixos tematicos: Fontes orais e o oficio do historiador; Historia oral, memoria e subjetividade; Historia oral, cidades e diferenca; Historia oral, desigualdades e movimentos sociais; Migracao, memoria e identidade; e Historia oral, ensino e diferenca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.127 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".