MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3209343090 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4270501

Guide to COVID-19 Rapid Response Data Sharing and Deposit for Canadian Researchers

2020· article· en· W3209343090 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jane Fry, Chantal Ripp, Felicity Tayler, Minglu Wang, Kristi Thompson, Lucia Costanzo, Kathy Szigeti, Rebecca Dickson, Roger Reka, Nick Rochlin, Mark Leggott, Erin Clary, Beth Knazook, Melanie Parlette-Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversityUniversity of GuelphPortage CollegeWestern UniversityUniversity of WindsorCouncil of Prairie and Pacific University LibrariesUniversity of OttawaUniversity of WaterlooCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPandemicComputer scienceInternet privacyBusinessMedicineVirologyOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This guide for Canadian researchers is based on the Research Data Alliance (RDA) COVID-19 Working Group Recommendations and Guidelines for Data Sharing, which were designed to help researchers follow best practices for data sharing in their discipline and maximize the impact of their work. This guide is modelled on previous work of Tayler and Ripp (2020) FAQ: COVID-19 Rapid Response Data Sharing and Deposit Support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.112
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.263
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1120.263
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0130.018
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0140.008
Open science0.0090.009
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3330.244

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.616
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicEthics in Clinical Research→French-language works237,207→