Substance Use During Pregnancy: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance Substance use during pregnancy is a major health issue for both the mother and the fetus, but it also represents an important public health concern. Objective The aim of this review was to summarize and compare recommendations from recently published guidelines on substance use during pregnancy and especially regarding alcohol, smoking, and drug use. Evidence Acquisition A descriptive review of guidelines from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on substance use was conducted. Regarding the term “substance use,” the most recently published Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition substances were used. Results All the reviewed guidelines recommend appropriate counseling and screening women regarding alcohol, smoking, and drug use during the antenatal period, while the management options vary. More specifically, the prompt management of alcohol dependence is emphasized by all the guidelines except from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, which makes no recommendation upon. The use of alcohol during breastfeeding should be avoided. Regarding smoking cessation, all guidelines recommend the use of certain psychosocial, behavioral interventions, and pharmacotherapy. All the guidelines, except the one from the WHO, suggest screening drug users for coexistent sexually transmitted infections. Brief interventions are considered beneficial, while a gradual decrease in benzodiazepines is suggested, as well as the discontinuation of marijuana and methamphetamine use. However, there is controversy regarding breastfeeding in those women as the WHO recommends in favor, whereas the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend against this practice. Finally, all the guidelines state that, following delivery, close monitoring of the neonate is needed. Conclusions The diversity of guidelines' recommendations concerning substance use reflects the different ways of the management of pregnant women during routine antenatal care due to absence of strong evidence. More research in the areas of dispute may allow the adoption of an international consensus, in order to early detect and appropriately manage pregnant women with harmful addictions. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. Learning Objectives After participating in this activity, the learner should be better able to assess all the available screening methods for substance use during pregnancy; describe the management procedures for substance use in pregnancy; and plan counseling during prenatal care, and explain breastfeeding options for women with substance abuse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.071 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".