Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unsupervised domain adaptation is the problem of transferring extracted knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain. To achieve discriminative domain adaptation recent studies take advantage of target sample pseudo-labels to impose class-aware distribution alignment across the source and target domains. Still, they have some shortcomings such as making decisions based on inaccurate pseudo-labeled samples that mislead the adaptation process. In this paper, we propose a progressive deep feature alignment, called Norma, to tackle class-aware unsupervised domain adaptation for image classification by enforcing inter-class compactness and intra-class discrepancy through a hybrid learning process. To this end, Norma's optimization process is defined based on a novel triplet loss which not only addresses soft prototype alignment but also pushes away multiple negative centroids. Also, to extract maximum discriminative domain knowledge per iteration, we propose a joint positive and negative learning procedure along with an uncertainty-guided progressive pseudo-labeling on the basis of prototype-based clustering and conditional probability. Our experimental results on several benchmarks demonstrate that Norma outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".