MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209382000 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2564164

librosa/librosa: 0.6.3

2019· article· en· W3209382000 on OpenAlexaff
Brian McFee, Matt McVicar, Stefan Balke, Vincent Lostanlen, Carl Thomé, Colin Raffel, Dana Lee, Kyungyun Lee, Oriol Nieto, Frank Zalkow, Dan Ellis, Eric Battenberg, Ryuichi Yamamoto, Josh Moore, Ziyao Wei, Rachel Bittner, Keunwoo Choi, nullmightybofo, Pius Friesch, Fabian-Robert Stöter, Thassilo, Matt Vollrath, Siddhartha Kumar Golu, nehz, Simon Waloschek, Seth, Rimvydas Naktinis, Douglas Repetto, Curtis Hawthorne, CJ Carr

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsSummit Pacific College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This release contains a few minor bugfixes and many improvements to documentation and usability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3340.625

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207