Méthodes d’enseignement en cours magistral : une analyse exploratoire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mthodes d'enseignement en cours magistral : une analyse exploratoire Formation et profession 29(3) 2021 1 sum Cet article vise recenser les mthodes pdagogiques privilgies par les enseignants universitaires en cours magistral en cycle licence et en tudier les liens entretenus avec leurs comptences transversales. L'analyse s'appuie sur des donnes dclaratives collectes l'aide d'une enqute en ligne mene auprs de prs de 248 enseignants d'une universit franaise. Il en ressort que malgr la mise en oeuvre d'une varit de mthodes, l' expos magistral reste prdominant en cours magistral. La crativit et le travail en quipe constituent des comptences transversales significativement lies aux mthodes pdagogiques des enseignants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it