MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Изотопный анализ коллагена в изучении пергамена средневековых рукописей: интерпретация первых результатов

2018· article· ru· W3209400886 on OpenAlex
Elena Ukhanova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueКраткие сообщения Института археологии (КСИА) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParchmentQuarter (Canadian coin)Interpretation (philosophy)ClassicsHistoryArtAncient historyArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Специфика древнерусского письменного наследия состоит в том, что бóльшая часть средневековых пергаменных кодексов XI–XIV вв. не содержит данных о месте их создания. Это обстоятельство является огромной проблемой отечественной медиевистики. Для ее решения нами была поставлена задача применить изотопный анализ коллагена (метод изотопной масс-спектрометрии) к большому комплексу древнейших пергаменных рукописей, хранящихся в Отделе рукописей Государственного исторического музея. В качестве первого объекта исследования были использованы пробы пергамена четырех новгородских кодексов последней четверти XII – последней четверти XIV в. из собрания Отдела рукописей Государственного исторического музея. Исследования двенадцати проб исторического пергамена были проведены в Институте геохимии и аналитической химии им. В. И. Вернадского (ГЕОХИ) РАН. Первые полученные результаты в области массспектрометрического анализа исторического пергамена нам кажутся вполне убедительными и перспективными для дальнейшего его применения в изучении локализации и элементов технологии изготовления средневековых рукописей. Specific features of Medieval Russia written heritage are stipulated by the fact that most medieval parchment codices do not contain data on the place where they were created. This fact is a true challenge for Russian medieval studies. To address this challenge, our task was to apply stable isotope analysis to a large corpus of the earliest parchment manuscripts kept in the Department of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books of the State Historical Museum. At first, parchment samples of four Novgorod codices dated to the last quarter of the 12th – last quarter of the 14th centuries from the collection of the Department of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books of the State Historical Museum were subjected to this analysis. The analysis of twelve samples of historical parchment was conducted in the Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences. We find the first results of the stable isotope analysis of the parchment quite conclusive and encouraging; hence, this approach can be applied in follow-up studies of the place of production and technological elements of medieval manuscript production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1360.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it