MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209432775 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2063_85

Where geology meets engineering in hydrothermally altered environments: considering veins in geotechnical engineering

2020· article· en· W3209432775 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jennifer J. Day, Malcolm W. Clark, Gisèle A. Rudderham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de la GaspésieQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's University
KeywordsGeologyGeotechnical engineeringExcavationMining engineeringGeomechanicsRock mechanicsSkarnHydrothermal circulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical properties of intact rock and fractures are key components that control rockmass behaviour in homogeneous rockmasses, which are the basis of many field characterization protocols, laboratory measurement, and numerical modelling approaches in geotechnical engineering. While effective in many cases of surface and underground excavations, these approaches are no longer adequate for particularly deep excavations in heterogeneous rockmasses, such as those with hydrothermal veins, stockwork, or other types of intrablock structures. Accounting for intrablock structures and other rockmass heterogeneity in rock engineering design has become critical for the safety and economic success of giant open pit mines, block caving operations, and other deep excavations. To do so, numerical modelling tools need to be integrated with improved characterization of heterogeneous rockmasses with all types of rockmass structures. In this work, the authors discuss rockmass characterization methodologies to address this challenge, including in field and laboratory settings, for application to numerical geotechnical design. Techniques to assess rock and vein mineralogies are discussed and examples illustrate the variety of mineralogies in porphyry and skarn ore deposits. Geotechnical field assessments of veined rockmasses in stress environments where shear-based failure and brittle spalling failure occur are presented. Geomechanical laboratory testing of veined rocks is discussed and a case study of unconfined compressive stress (UCS) tests on rocks from the Canadian Legacy skarn deposit is presented, where the interpretations of UCS test results are explained using mineralogical analyses. Geological interpretations of these heterogeneous rocks are an important part of understanding their geomechanical behaviours and extrapolating to predict rockmass behaviours at the excavation scale both empirically and numerically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207