MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tracking Changes in Asphaltene Nanoaggregate Size Distributions as a Function of Silver Complexation via Gel Permeation Chromatography Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

2021· article· en· W3209463098 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Zheng, Rémi Moulian, Martha L. Chacón‐Patiño, Ryan P. Rodgers, Caroline Barrère‐Mangote, Murray R. Gray, Pierre Giusti, Quan Shi, Brice Bouyssière

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAsphalteneGel permeation chromatographyMass spectrometrySize-exclusion chromatographyInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryChromatographyElutionVanadiumAcetoneInductively coupled plasmaInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphaltene elution behavior in gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was studied with and without the presence of silver triflate (AgOTf) via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The experiments highlighted the influence of AgOTf on the molecular weight profiles for atmospheric residues (ARs), asphaltenes, and their extrography subfractions. Specifically, the molecular weight distribution of the sulfur-, vanadium-, and nickel-containing compounds changed markedly with the addition of AgOTf, which suggests that AgOTf disrupts/alters the interaction between Ni and vanadyl porphyrins and select S-containing compounds within asphaltene nanoaggregates. However, similar effects were not observed with AgOTf addition to the high-molecular-weight GPC fractions of AR and the acetone extrography asphaltene fraction, which is comprised of abundant, highly aromatic/single-core compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207