MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209467535 · doi:10.25244/tf.v14i1.3530

A respeito de sagrado. Sagrado como aparência:

2021· article· pt· W3209467535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrilhas Filosóficas · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Testimony
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O sagrado como o acontecimento ser-aparecer ― pura superfície. Extraordinário! Aparecer não é manifestar-se ― aparência não é manifestação. Superfície, pura superfície, põe mistério. Mistério não tapa, não obstrui, escondendo e adiando infinitamente. Mistério encerra retração, recuo, sim, mas ele mostra à medida que se retrai e graças ao retrair-se ― mostra/revela o escuro como escuro, o não ver como não ver, o não saber como não saber, o não poder como não poder, a ausência como ausência, enfim, o sem fundo (o abissal) como sem fundo (o abissal). A presença da ausência como ausência. A superfície do abismo. Acolhendo mistério, o sagrado, impera finitude como o registro e a regência da e na vida ― finitude como a casa do homem. A Terra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it