MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209467535 · doi:10.25244/tf.v14i1.3530

A respeito de sagrado. Sagrado como aparência:

2021· article· pt· W3209467535 on OpenAlexaff
Gilvan Fogel

Bibliographic record

VenueTrilhas Filosóficas · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Testimony
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O sagrado como o acontecimento ser-aparecer ― pura superfície. Extraordinário! Aparecer não é manifestar-se ― aparência não é manifestação. Superfície, pura superfície, põe mistério. Mistério não tapa, não obstrui, escondendo e adiando infinitamente. Mistério encerra retração, recuo, sim, mas ele mostra à medida que se retrai e graças ao retrair-se ― mostra/revela o escuro como escuro, o não ver como não ver, o não saber como não saber, o não poder como não poder, a ausência como ausência, enfim, o sem fundo (o abissal) como sem fundo (o abissal). A presença da ausência como ausência. A superfície do abismo. Acolhendo mistério, o sagrado, impera finitude como o registro e a regência da e na vida ― finitude como a casa do homem. A Terra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrilhas FilosóficasSame topicMemory, Trauma, and TestimonyFrench-language works237,207